Silent dangers
The quiet concerns around EVs
Almost half (47%) of pedestrians are concerned about how quiet electric vehicles (EVs) are.
The poll from Venson Automotive Solutions also found that more than a quarter (27%) of respondents had been surprised by a plug-in car’s almost silent approach.
Hearing danger
Before the widespread sales of EVs, many groups raised fear over the dangers around silent approaches.
Most pedestrians, consciously and unconsciously, use their ears to prepare them for the approach of vehicles.
Often, it leads to proper, more effective looking before crossing the road.
For those with impaired sight or suffering from blindness, sound is an essential safety warning.
This led to the EU researching the issue and introducing regulations to protect vulnerable road users in particular.
Listening lessons
These new findings come despite the introduction of EU regulations on EV noise levels.
They have required the use of an Acoustic Vehicle Alerting System (AVAS) since 2019.
Venson says that without tighter regulation and greater consistency on the artificial noises a plug-in vehicle makes, the safety of vulnerable road users could continue to be put at risk.
It highlights academic research, published by the British Medical Journal (BMJ), that found pedestrians may be twice as likely to be hit by an EV or hybrid car compared to petrol or diesel vehicles.
Plugging into sound
Some 49% of those surveyed by Venson said they think the running noise of an EV should be a standard one that all manufacturers must use.
However, more than a third (37%) of those surveyed feel that car buyers should be able to determine the noise their EV makes in transit.
These could be chosen from a predetermined list of regulated options from the manufacturer.
Only 13% believed that manufacturers should be able to have their own standard but regulated noise that differentiates their brand.
Currently, when an EV is being driven at low speed or in reverse, a noise automatically starts; in type, they can vary from clearly artificial bells and chimes to those that mimic engine sounds or tyres moving over gravel.
One in four (26%) said they would prefer EVs to have a noise that mimics a traditional ICE engine. The next most popular choice was a continuous low-decibel sound, which 21% of road users would choose.
On the quiet
Simon Staton, client management director for Venson Automotive Solutions, said: “It is easy to see how the stealth-like approach of some EVs, coupled with the varying beeps and chimes of these vehicles when driven in reverse, can confuse some of the UK’s more vulnerable pedestrians, like children or those who are hard of hearing.
“Of course, the integration of AVAS into hybrid vehicles back in 2019 was a tremendously positive step, but as our research reveals, 27% of road users have narrowly avoided an incident with an EV, so more needs to be done.
“When people rely on sound to judge the presence, location, and speed of vehicles to protect themselves from harm, easily recognised sounds that can be clearly heard are voted the best.”